Yep, without 2 engines, IFR is 100% fatal.

New Message Alert

Author: Is for the Date: 5/13/2023 3:36:28 PM +1/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Military huh. Have fun in yur tiny single IMC advocating a 407 is better than a 429 ya dumdum

Suddenly? Didn't the contract with Bell years ago to (NT) +0/-0 to do this? 5/13/2023 1:13:11 PM

Yep, without 2 engines, IFR is 100% fatal. (NT) +0/-2 You're a genius. 5/13/2023 3:09:59 PM

Yep, without 2 engines, IFR is 100% fatal. +1/-0 Is for the 5/13/2023 3:36:28 PM

No question, you're a genius. Thanks for (NT) +0/-1 making my point. 5/13/2023 8:51:14 PM

Yep, without 2 engines, IFR is 100% fatal. +0/-2 Real pilot 5/14/2023 4:43:32 PM

Yep, without 2 engines, IFR is 100% fatal. +0/-0 say wut 5/14/2023 4:45:12 PM

+1/-0 SPIFR 407 GXi 5/13/2023 7:40:38 PM

Alabaman Lifesaver crews deemed the 130 �unsafe� and cried and complained +2/-2 Got what they wished for�.whiners! 5/13/2023 5:05:16 PM

Well, we know at least one of them was (NT) +1/-2 somewhat unsafe. 5/13/2023 9:10:57 PM

No, you really don't know anything. (NT) +2/-0 Might not have been the acft! 5/14/2023 12:37:19 AM

I know when a 407 rolls on it's side, it doesn't (NT) +2/-1 kill everyone on that side. 5/14/2023 7:58:56 PM

Sounds safe to me.... Not! +2/-0 For Immediate Release: 5/14/2023 10:53:47 PM

no one died...see the (NT) +0/-1 difference? 5/15/2023 1:11:36 AM

Oh, I see, general safety wasn't your criteria. Well +1/-0 how about these then: 5/15/2023 9:21:16 AM

Oh, I see, general safety wasn't your criteria. Well +0/-1 Your facts 5/15/2023 1:17:01 PM

Why is air methods suddenly getting rid of the ec130s and going back 407s +0/-0 Didn�t they announce a few years 5/17/2023 7:39:03 PM

Yup. (NT) +0/-0 Anonymous 5/17/2023 10:46:32 PM